Showing posts with label US. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US. Show all posts

Thursday, May 09, 2013

Obama administration on the domestic as well as the international stage

Not much changed for the US in 2012. Obama stays President, Republicans continue to control the House of Representatives and Democrats retain their hold on the Senate. While American citizens should continue to hope for a lot from the Obama administration on the domestic as well as the international stage, but what they will actually get in 2013 may be much less
A comprehensive program to increase economic opportunity and reduce inequality is also needed – its goal being to remove, within the next decade, America’s distinction as the advanced country with the highest inequality & least social mobility. This implies, among other things, a fair tax system that’s more progressive and eliminates distortions and loopholes that allow speculators to pay taxes at a lower effective rate than those who work for a living, and that enable the rich to use the Cayman Islands to avoid paying their fair share.

America – and the world – would also benefit from a US energy policy that reduces reliance on imports not just by increasing domestic production, but also by cutting consumption, and that recognizes the risks posed by global warming. Moreover, America’s science and technology policy must reflect an understanding that long-term increases in living standards depend upon productivity growth, which reflects technological progress that assumes a solid foundation of basic research.

Finally, the US needs a financial system that serves all of society, rather than operating as if it were an end in itself. That means that the system’s focus must shift from speculative and proprietary trading to lending and job creation, which implies reforms of financial-sector regulation, and of anti-trust and corporate-governance laws, together with adequate enforcement to be able to ensure that the markets do not become rigged casinos.

Globalization has made all countries more interdependent, in turn requiring greater global cooperation. We might hope that America will show more leadership in terms of reforming the global financial system by advocating for stronger international regulation, a global reserve system, and better ways to restructure sovereign debt; in addressing global warming; in democratizing the international economic institutions; and also in providing assistance to poorer countries.

Americans should hope for all of this, though I am not sanguine that they will get much of it. More likely, America will muddle through – here another little program for struggling students and homeowners, there the end of the Bush tax cuts for millionaires, but no wholesale tax reform, no serious cutbacks in defense spending, or significant progress on global warming.

With the euro crisis likely to continue unabated, America’s continuing malaise does not bode well for global growth. Even worse, in the absence of strong American leadership, longstanding global problems – from climate change to urgently needed reforms of the international monetary system – will continue to fester. Nonetheless, we should be grateful: it is better to be standing still than to be headed in the wrong direction.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Thursday, May 02, 2013

RIP: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, 2012

The recent changes in bailout agreements indicate that the Federal Government is now gearing up the process to end the era of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But is it the right time? Is the US housing market ready to accept this and move on with the reform process to a new system? An analysis of why this is essential.

The United States government couldn’t have been clearer on this. The latest changes to the US Treasury bailout agreements with government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac clearly indicate that it’s just a matter of days when the official words will be out to wind them up; the process has started though. As per the changes made to the agreements, the mortgage finance giants have been asked to turn over all profits to the government and wind down their large investment portfolios at 15% per year rather than 10% as stated earlier. Result: The US government would soon take over all business controlled by the two GSEs for which it has been acting as the primary guarantor since both the institutions announced bankruptcy in 2008. The fact is that when the US government decided to continue the two agencies after bankruptcy, everyone knew that sooner or later they will be asked to shut their shops. They only existed because the government wanted them for reviving the distressed US housing market. Now, when the government looks decisive, the question remains, has the US housing market stabilised enough to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie? It’s a point worth exploring besides understanding how the two mortgage giants have contributed to the overall US housing scenario.

The story of Fannie Mae is certainly interesting in this regard for the fact that it was commissioned in 1938 after the Great Depression provide the necessary impetus to the US housing market as a part of the New Deal (a series of economic programmes enacted in US between 1933 and 1936). Interestingly, it was this mortgage giant that ended up initiating the second biggest financial crisis ever. In fact, by the time Global Financial Crisis started (in the second quarter of 2008) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the younger counter art of Fannie Mae was commissioned in 1970 to give competition to the former) had been exposed to subprime/Alt-A loans worth a mind-boggling $388 billion and $392 billion respectively. Certainly, considering that the annual Private-label Mortgage-backed Securities issuances remained at over $800 billion per year in 2005 and 2006, one cannot say that these GSEs caused the crisis, but they for sure were the biggest contributors. Perhaps this was what prompted Senator John McCain to say that “the catalyst for this housing crisis” was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In one of the debates during the Presidential campaign in 2008, he had claimed that these two GSEs “caused the subprime lending situation that now caused the housing market in America to collapse.”

However, with the taxpayers owing close to 80% of the two GSEs post bankruptcy, the onus was on the government to use them to reorganise the US housing market. And as it can be seen, the job is done, at least to some extent. After long, the US housing market seems gaining legs. What is more interesting is the fact that now it’s in a situation where people have started looking forward to it as a growth driver. Agrees Celia Chen, West Chester based Senior Director at Moody’s Analytics, as she tells B&E, “Housing, once the Achilles’ heel of the US economy, is starting to look like a source of strength in a recovery that has lost its vigor and faces significant roadblocks. That housing is now a bright spot speaks more about the weakness of the recovery than absolute strength in housing.” This comes as a relief at a time when the other drivers of growth are faltering. Housing is about to turn from being a drag on the broader economy to being a driver. 


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Saturday, April 20, 2013

B&E Indicators

Inadequate logistics network

Logistics infrastructure is a critical enabler of India’s economic development. Recognising this pivotal role, India has tripled its logistics infrastructure spend from $10 billion in 2003 to over $30 billion in 2011. However, despite this increase, the country’s logistics network remain insufficient. Still seven corridors along with some national highways handle 40% of road freight traffic even though they are less than 0.5% of the Indian road network.

Relies excessively on roads

India’s roads account for a higher share of freight traffic compared to other continental sized countries like US and China. In fact, India’s dependence on roads is more than three times that of China. This is despite the fact that a large part of the country’s freight traffic comprises bulk material and moves over long distances that can be more economically served by rail and waterways.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Friday, April 19, 2013

Can he be a change agent for his party?

Keeping in mind the mood of the electorate, which has become increasingly clamorous for change and development, Akhilesh Yadav appears to be going about in earnest giving his party a much-needed makeover.

Way back in the 1980s two Young Turks set out on a mission to transform Indian politics. One of them was Ajit Singh - the America-returned son of Chaudhary Charan Singh (aka kisan neta), the former Prime Minister of India. A computer engineer who spent 17 years in the US, Ajit made Baghpat his pocket borough, travelling the length and breadth of the constituency. He went all out to court the youth and dreamt of bringing about a massive change in the state’s political scenario.

The other young man was none other than former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s son, Rajiv Gandhi. A Cambridge University alumnus, Rajiv became a beacon of hope for the educated youth of the country.

Both Ajit and Rajiv went on to achieve huge success in terms of winning thousands of followers. Most still fondly recall Rajiv while Ajit Singh, now a Cabinet minister in the UPA government, is known as one of the most opportunistic political leaders of our times.

Flash forward to the present and there is an unmistakable sense of déjà vu. Once again we see a young duo trying to change the political scenario of the state. One of them is Rajiv’s son, Rahul Gandhi, and the other one is former UP chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav’s son, Akhilesh Yadav. Both are ‘foreign educated’.

Recent months have seen Rahul take upon himself the challenge of resurrecting his party from the state of political wilderness in which it has been moldering since 1989. In a bid to revive his party’s challenge in UP and galvanise an otherwise moribund party apparatus in the state, Rahul has undertaken numerous stump tours and has been organising party and public meetings in different parts of the state. The Gandhi scion, in his campaign speeches, has repeatedly harped on the issues of employment and development and has talked of transforming the fortunes of the state if his party is voted to power. And though Rahul has staked his own political credibility in the polls most political observers are not very optimistic about Congress’s chances. But that has, however, not prevented senior Congress leaders such as Pramod Tewari from claiming that the Congress would be able to win majority on its own.

Though both Rahul and Akhilesh have their own challenges to face, the latter’s task seems more difficult. As the State President of the Samajwadi Party - an outfit accused of promoting casteism and sometimes even called the ‘goonda’ party. - not only does he need to change the party’s image, he also needs to bring it back to power. Sanjay Lathar, National President of Samajwadi Yuvjan Sabha and the man in-charge of Akhilesh’s political campaign, says, “We have the largest number of youths and females contesting the elections. About 122 of them are highly educated first-timers and 75% have held positions in student unions. We have also created history by giving tickets to 40 women.” According to Lathar, the party was approached by about 50 candidates with muscle power. “Around 30 to 35 of them would have won the elections. Yet the party decided not to embrace them,” he added.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Global top 10 debt analysis

The top 10 indebted nations of the world are the countries who are currently struggling from the financial downturn. While US tops The list in terms of absolute value, japan stands out in terms of debt to gdp ratio. Though raising of the debt ceiling by the us has already triggered a fear of double dip recession, there are others as well who are giving the world sleepless nights.

Everybody knows it

The raising of the debt ceiling by the Obama government followed by S&P’s downgrade of US treasury bonds says it all. With the country now sitting on top of a debt pile that is a notch higher than its GDP of $14.7 trillion, the largest in the world, the global economy is now teetering on the brink. But the gradual escalation in debt, which has been happening for over a decade before it just shot up to $10.5 trillion in 2008 after a $700 billion bailout package, doesn’t seem to be taking a breather. IMF forecasts US debt will increase to $15.15 trillion by 2015. Obama’s ratings have apparently fallen to the lowest ever. If one could prove a negative correlation of his ratings with debt, would that motivate him enough to reduce US debt?

Do the world like japan

If the US showcases the highest national debt, Japan is not too far behind with a total debt of 1,055.54 trillion Japanese Yen ($13.75 trillion using exchange rates prevailing on August 17, 2011). Considering the current sensitivity of the global financial market, the impact of the dire fiscal position of Japan could be felt worldwide as it is also capable of creating a domino effect on the sovereign debt front. The country has so far been able to save itself despite a huge debt load since the days of the real estate bubble burst (early 1990s). Also, a major reason why the country is still not considered to be in a financial-crisis mode is that it owes most of that debt to itself. Moreover, IMF forecasts Japan’s debt will grow at a slower rate than the US.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Friday, April 12, 2013

Time to unleash the green growth

Be it climate change, water scarcity, biodiversity loss, or ecosystem degradation; green economics can weave together these strands. According to ‘TEEB’ report, ecosystem delivers essential services worth $21 to $72 trillion a year while the commercial opportunities in natural resource sector alone could be between $2.1-6.3 trillion by 2050. The implication: green and growth can go hand in hand.

Seeking Competitive Gains
Given the prevailing environmental and economic challenges, countries and corporations have come up with policies and strategies in order to shift towards cleaner and greener business practices along with green innovation. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is of the view that greener business practices will have important economic pay-offs in terms of resource efficiency. IEA estimates that 17% (approximately $46 trillion) increase in energy investment is required globally between 2010 and 2050 to deliver low-carbon energy systems, which will consequently yield a cumulative fuel savings worth $112 trillion. As a competitive factor, companies are seeking competitiveness gains through clean and green technology investment.

Environmetnal Challenges

OECD, in its recent report, states that the impact of economic activity on environmental systems are creating imbalances which are putting economic growth and development at risk. As a matter of fact, existing loss of biodiversity and degradation has already had dramatic consequences for business; soil erosion in Europe is estimated to cost 53 euro per hectare per annum. A 2007 report of the World Bank estimated that the cost of excessive use of groundwater in China was in the range of 0.3% of GDP (the cost fell largely on the agriculture sector). The TEEB 2010 report estimates the annual economic loss caused by introduction of agricultural pests in the US, UK, India, Brazil et al to be more than $100 billion.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Obama moves in fast to repair the Middle East

Mere rhetoric can fall flat unless Obama moves in fast to repair the Middle East

Middle Eastern people’s analysis of US policy will not be transformed merely by a triumph for Barack Obama. Rather, they want to see no-nonsense steps by him to end the occupation of their land. The Palestine question will be the gravest challenge. If a sovereign Palestinian state with Beit-ul-Moqaddas (Jerusalem) as its capital is not created, the state of affairs in the region will beyond doubt deteriorate.

“In the newfangled circumstances, where the US has seen a change in control, a new chance has been made available to US officials to modify their approach toward Iran,” said Hossein Alai. Alai also believes the US has viewed Iran as a “problem” which is the root cause of all recent crises between the two nations. If Barack Obama modifies this outlook and recognises Iran as a strategically and politically significant country, then there will be a scene for establishing a credible Tehran-Washington dialogue.

Evidently, Barack Obama has a lofty order. He devices to recover “America’s moral stature in the world” with one of the first things on his “to do list” being the shutting down of Guantanamo Bay and a stop to military torture. Furthermore, over the years, he has damned America’s entrance into Iraq and promoted a speedy pulling out of US troops. These moves can’t come almost immediately; but first, he must defy pressure from the old guard and the more hawkish of his advisers to walk with prudence. This new broom desires not only to sweep up clean but must also be open-minded in the exercise of strong antiseptic before we can even start to pardon the infringements of human rights committed by his precursor.

First, he has to abandon the ludicrous, hollow term “war on terror” as well as the guiding principles that draw from it, which have prompted militant radicalism rather than eliminating it. Instead, he must learn terrorism’s pedigree and how best to soothe anti-American/anti-Western emotion through discourse and cultural exchange. He can start off by instructing his border guards to behave reverently to all visitors to the US, especially those with Muslim names.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Monday, January 07, 2013

A river (used to) run through it

The biggest issue of this century will be preservation of water

Mark Twain (in an editorial by Charles D. Warner, Hartford Courant, in 1897) said, “Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.” 112 years ago, Warner’s op-ed quoted that if you are in Colorado, it’s illegal to divert rainwater falling on your property unless you have a very old water right or when the weather is “very happy.” In other words, you could not harvest rainwater for personal use. Surprise surprise. The situation’s the same even now in Colorado.

Interestingly, many other states in the US are reportedly taking steps now to set up similar rules. UK goes one-step further and fines anyone using hosepipes (a 1,000 pounds fine). On the other extreme is New Mexico, which makes it mandatory for new dwellings to harvest water. So what’s our drift? The drift is that today, one third of the world’s population is suffering from water shortages; and by 2025, as per UN, two out of three people would undergo “water stress.”

Read more.....

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Monday, November 26, 2012

On second thought...

With rising disposable incomes & soaring aspirations, the second hand car market is on a roll

spirations have led man to the moon! The quest of being the best among peers is what spears a man ahead of the race. But all these desires come with lots of constraints – lack of finances being one of them. One such aspiration that has remained long unfulfilled for many Indians is the desire to own a family car. But no more! The second hand car market has made all those dreams of driving an opulent vehicle come true. The growing used car market across the country in the form of both organised and unorganised players is a testimony to the vast potential of this segment.

According to the Society of Automobile Manufacturers in India, the used car market currently in India stands at over one million units, almost as big as the new-car market (1.3 million units). But the used car market in India is highly unorganised, with the organised players accounting for just 20-25%. The main organised players are Maruti (True Value), Hyundai (Advantage), Ford (Assured), Mahindra (Automart India) & Honda (Auto Terrace). The situation is however, completely different in developed markets like the US and Europe, where organised players have grabbed nearly 90% of the used-car market pie. “Consumers’ decisions are fast getting influenced by the quality of after sales service and the value addition. An organised channel definitely adds to the value proposition with quality assurance through warranty,” assures Nikhil Kumar, General Manager Marketing, First Choice, M&M. Buying decision of a consumer really begins with scouring the used-car market for the best bargains. And it’s a known fact that very few Indian buyers pay an expert to evaluate the vehicle and mostly rely on personal mechanics and friends. Thus, a decision of going to an unorganised player might result in a redundant purchase.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Regulators or Collaborators?

Are regulators in India today focusing on the job that they were supposed to do all along – regulating? Or have they, in the flow of industrialization and ‘development’, become collaborators with the very entities they were supposed to regulate? B&E brings an analysis of the current state of affairs and reality within and without these regulators!

Harry Markopolos is his name. This former US Army Major, working for a US investment firm, was deputed by his company in the year 2000 to analyse the numbingly outstanding market strategies and returns of a leading competing investment manager. Harry considered himself a master of data analytics, one who could outlearn any financial wizardry that markets were implementing. Yet, however hard he tried – and he tried too hard – he just couldn’t replicate the returns being generated by this competitor. All roads of Harry’s analysis strangely led to only one conclusion – the man, a legend in the industry, was committing a fraud of historic proportions. Harry subsequently contacted the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), the US Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, other regulatory bodies, even Wall Street Journal – none gave a credible response, leave alone action. Harry didn’t give up, realizing that almost all the regulatory bodies and individuals were somehow directly or indirectly in collusion with the competitor in question. Harry Markopolos’ 21-page submission to SEC, titled “The World’s Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud,” changed the financial world in a way no one perhaps had ever done before. On December 11, 2008, Bernard L. Madoff – legendary investment adviser and stock broker – was arrested by the SEC for the world’s largest financial fraud ever, a $65 billion Ponzi scheme.

Read more.....

An Initiative of IIPMMalay Chaudhuri 
and Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles. 

Prof. Rajita Chaudhuri's Website

domain-b.com : IIPM ranked ahead of IIMs
Arindam Chaudhuri's Portfolio - he is at his candid best by Society Magazine 
IIPM Best B School India
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM's Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting

Professor Arindam Chaudhuri - A Man For The Society....
 
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global

IIPM B-School Detail

Monday, August 13, 2012

Technonsenselogy!

It has been routinely predicted that salvation will be found in tech- advancement; is all the government tech babble pure nonsense?

Considering that billions still live below the poverty line across the world, the fact that countries can justify raking up investments into so called futuristic tech-areas illustrating an unrealistic and impractical canvas of future technological development that would supposedly bring the advent of utopia, is not only ironic but cruelly criminal to those underprivileged billions. In this issue, the IIPM Think Tank analyses technologies that have either brought quasi revolutions or endangered the economic existence of nations.

Most of this Olympic tech-orientation can be attributed to developments that were being experienced in Japan in the early 20th century. But not without costs. Russia’s numerous failed space missions, the Chernobyl disaster, the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear accident (cleaning up cost around $975 million), the Ariane 5 explosion ($500 million) – all these and other incidents took economies of some countries a few years back.

But then, these are only totem pole examples. The ring leaders are others. Take for instance the money spent on space missions by the US during 1957-1975, which stood at $100 billion (USSR mirrored some facets of the insane spending; for example, by 1989, it was spending around $4 billion on space exploration annually). Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, started in 1983, was even more legendary, with costs of over $100 billion. Some experts opine that this space-race eventually gave birth to numerous fissures in the economies of both the countries.




Saturday, July 28, 2012

Stratagem-INTERNATIONAL : P&G VS UNILEVER: THE BATTLE FOR GLOBAL DOMINANCE

Having been in existence for 173 and 81 years respectively, P&G and Unilever are legends in their own rights. After years of divestitures and streamlining, P&G has a strong lead. But with a little help from Acquisitions and Emerging market presence, Unilever could end up as The Undisputed consumer goods leader. 

Interestingly, P&G is aggressively focussing on shedding business units, which do not complement its core product categories. On April 5, 2011, P&G sold off Pringles, (the food brand, which generated over $1 billion in annual sales) for $1.5 billion. Pringles made up for roughly 1%-2% of P&G’s sales. Despite significant competitive advantage, P&G is facing the brunt of rising input costs, which is evident from their net sales and profits for 2010. The FMCG giant recorded sales of $78.9 billion in 2010 as against $76.9 billion compared to last year. However, net profits declined to $12.7 billion from $13.4 billion in 2009. Speaking to B&E from Chicago, Lauren DeSanto, Chief Operating Officer, Equity Research, Morningstar says, “Over the longer term, I think P&G can increase sales by 4.5% on an average, which assumes roughly 3% of organic sales growth and then an additional 1.5% annually from acquisitions”.

But unlike his rival, Polman is trying to make Unilever much more robust (which is evident from the bifurcation of responsibilities) by reinforcing its portfolio even if it means acquisitive growth. In 2010, the company acquired Sara Lee’s personal care business and Alberto Culver for $1.67 billion and $3.7 billion. Raison d’être? Unilever has suffered the misfortune arising out of a complex and decentralised structure just like P&G. A clear cut demarcation of segments would drive profitability much more realistically.

Although P&G is clearly ahead, Unilever may be the ultimate winner. One look at statistics and everything falls into perspective. In US and European markets (which contribute almost 70% to net sales), P&G grows at a rate of 1%, & in the developing markets it grows at 8%-12%. And this is where the US major loses out to Unilever. The Anglo-Dutch company invested a lot and much earlier in emerging economies, which make up for over 50% of its revenues.

But Unilever which recorded $62.64 billion in revenues needs to consider is that 50% of its sales come from packaged food products, while the remaining come from personal and home care. Thus, it needs to work on sustaining revenues from food brands in developed markets (which are stagnating. Moreover, it’s a lot more difficult to penetrate Western culinary delights in markets like India & China), while leveraging the scale and distribution prowess it already commands in emerging economies. A possible way to that might be acquiring more companies in the personal care segment (like it did with Alberto Culver and Sara Lee’s personal care arm) as well as in food. For now, Colgate-Palmolive is a good bet. At a current market value of $36.8 billion, it’s trading at less than nine times EBITDA. P&G cannot afford to make a remotely similar acquisition because that would invite regulatory scrutiny on anti-competitive grounds.

McDonald’s innovation engine may make a significant difference, but there is a pressing need for acquisitions for P&G. The company needs to dump more of its assets that cater to developed economies and look at targets in developing ones that are lucrative as well as safe from regulatory ire. Without this major realignment, P&G may continue to give Unilever an ‘unfair’ advantage.